ODOP Sample Report: Utilities

IonPeak | ODOP Sample Work Product (Utilities)
IonPeak

Operational Decision Optimization Review (ODOP) — Utilities (Sample Detailed Deliverable)

Example work product for a mid-market electric distribution utility. All data is illustrative but realistic.

Sample • Public Website Copy Client: NorthRiver Electric (Sample) Report Date: 2026-02-13

Executive Summary Cost • Uptime • Safety • Auditability

This ODOP review identifies where NorthRiver’s highest-impact operational decisions are slowed by fragmented inputs, unclear thresholds, and inconsistent governance. The deliverable provides a defensible decision model: inputs → constraints → tradeoffs → governance → audit trail.

Assets in Scope

31,750

Poles, transformers, switches, feeders

Customers

212,000

Mixed urban / rural; winter storm exposure

Annual O&M Budget

$94.5M

Ops + maintenance + vegetation + field services

Top Value Gap

Capital

High risk + low clarity + weak governance

Engagement scope (sample)

  • Duration: 5 weeks
  • Stakeholders: 15 interviews (COO, VP Ops, Asset Mgmt, Finance, Control Room, Safety)
  • Workshops: 4 (maintenance, capital, outages, inventory)
  • Systems reviewed: CMMS/EAM, GIS, OMS/SCADA, ERP/Finance, Inventory
  • Deliverables: heatmap, visuals, tradeoff model + workbook, governance & audit trail, 90-day roadmap

Baseline performance snapshot (illustrative)

MetricObservedTarget
Backlog aging (WOs > 90 days)38%< 20%
Repeat outages (same device, 30 days)11%< 5%
Capital decision cycle (median)7.4 weeks< 3.5 weeks
SAIDI (rolling 12 mo)132 min< 110 min
Regulatory evidence turnaround10–15 days< 3 days

0) Sample Charts Example Data

Illustrative charts commonly included in an ODOP package (utilities context).

Decision latency by domain (Pre vs Post target)

Days 21 14 7 0 MaintCapitalInventoryOutages Pre Post target

Illustrative: Maintenance 21d → 10d; Capital 18d → 9d; Inventory 5d → 3d; Outage escalation 2d → 1d.

SAIDI drivers (rolling 12 months, illustrative)

Min 60 40 20 0 StormsEquipVegPlanned Interpretation ODOP focuses on controllable drivers (equip, veg, planned)

Illustrative split of 132 min SAIDI: storms 54, equipment 34, vegetation 24, planned 16.

1) Decision Heatmap Diagnostic

Risk exposure vs clarity vs governance strength — leadership alignment view.

Decision DomainRisk ExposureDecision ClarityGovernance StrengthDecision Latency
Maintenance Prioritization
Backlog triage • deferrals • PM vs corrective
High Medium Weak 7–21 days
Capital Allocation
Renewals • replacement vs repair • benefit sizing
High Low Weak 6–12 weeks
Outage Escalation
Thresholds • comms cadence • incident commander
Medium Medium Moderate 15–60 min
Inventory Replenishment
Critical spares • min/max • lead-time risk
Medium High Strong 1–5 days

2) Visual: Decision Flow Architecture Before vs After

How decisions typically move today vs a structured ODOP model.

Current-State (Unstructured)

DataInputs Spreadsheets+ Email InformalDiscussion EscalationConfusion Delayed Decision → Reactive Outcome

Structured Decision Model (Post-ODOP)

Data Sources (CMMS / GIS / OMS / SCADA / Finance) Constraint Layer (Budget | Crews | Compliance | Risk) Tradeoff Engine (Reliability vs Safety vs Cost) Decision Governance (Authority | Escalation | Logs) Prioritized, Defensible Decision

3) Visual: Tradeoff Curve Risk + Cost Reduced

Post-ODOP point is lower risk and lower cost (down-left) due to reduced rework and emergency spend.

Risk ↑Cost → High Med Low Current Post-ODOP

4) Escalation Architecture Outage Response

Time-bound escalation with clear authority eliminates ambiguity and supports audits.

TriggerOutage ThresholdSeverity AuthorityRole Time-boundSLA OutcomeLogged

5) Governance + Audit Trail Controls

Authority matrix (sample)

Decision TypeOwnerApproverEvidenceSLA
Maintenance deferral (critical asset)Maint MgrOps DirectorRisk score + inspection + mitigation24h
Capital reprioritizationAsset MgmtCFO + COORisk reduced/$ + constraints5d
Outage escalation S1/S2Control RoomIncident CmdrSeverity criteria + ETR10–20m

Decision log (sample)

Decision ID: ODOP-CAP-0312 Domain: Capital Allocation Trigger: Q2 capex envelope confirmed ($5.5M) + hotspot flags on SUB-3 Inputs: SCADA alarms, DGA, outage history, GIS critical facilities map, cost estimates, crew calendar Constraints: Capex <= $5.5M; lead time 18 weeks; 2 crews; regulatory safety band R-3 Tradeoff: Selected SUB-3 transformer + FDR-12 reclosers over pole renewal (permit delay) Approver: CFO + COO Outcome: Portfolio approved; procurement initiated; Q3 pre-permit started

6) 90-Day Roadmap Implementation

30 / 60 / 90 days

  • 30: publish thresholds + authority matrix; start decision logs
  • 60: CMMS mandatory deferral fields + standard failure codes; simple decision dashboard
  • 90: tradeoff model v1 + sensitivity analysis; automate approvals + evidence attachments

Data dictionary (minimum)

  • Asset_ID, Criticality_Class, Risk_Score
  • Constraint_Band, Lead_Time_Weeks
  • Decision_Rationale, Approver_Role
Note: All values are illustrative. This is a website-ready sample ODOP work product for utilities.

Client Context (Sample) Utility

Quick reader view for executives and stakeholders.

NorthRiver Electric — Snapshot

  • Industry: Electric distribution utility
  • Service territory: mixed urban/rural; storm exposure
  • KPIs: SAIDI/SAIFI, safety incidents, regulatory evidence turnaround
  • Systems: CMMS/EAM + GIS + OMS/SCADA + ERP/Finance

Top pain points (sample)

  • Backlog prioritization varies by depot/supervisor
  • Capital decisions slow and hard to defend
  • Deferrals not consistently documented (audit friction)
  • Lead-time risk not surfaced early (schedule slips)

Primary ODOP deliverables

HeatmapDecision FlowTradeoff Curve Escalation RulesGovernanceAudit Trail 90-Day Roadmap

Value statement

“We reduce downtime and budget shocks by making operational tradeoffs explicit, repeatable, and auditable — using your existing CMMS, GIS, OMS/SCADA and finance data.”

Website hint: screenshot Heatmap, Decision Flow, Tradeoff, Escalation, and Governance sections as a “Utilities Sample Report”.